View Our Practice Areas

Supreme Court: Utah was right; DUI blood tests do require warrant

The U.S. Supreme Court has made its decision in Missouri v. McNeely, in which a man who was subjected to a blood alcohol test against his will so that police could prove he was driving under the influence of alcohol. The man appealed his DUI conviction on the grounds that forcing him to submit to a blood test violated his constitutional rights. Today, the high court ruled that it did.

While blood alcohol tests are more prone to error than many people realize, they are generally considered to be the best way to tell if someone has been driving drunk. The State of Missouri, joined by the federal government, had hoped the Supreme Court would rule that warrants would never be required in DUI cases. Their most notable argument was that alcohol in the blood dissipates over time, making it urgent to obtain the suspect's blood immediately.

The high courts of both Utah and Iowa, however, have already ruled that warrants are required by their own constitutions before law enforcement can administer such an intrusive test. The justices took specific notice of Utah's ruling and of our electronic search warrant process, which makes obtaining the warrants much faster.

Eight of the nine justices agreed that dissipation of alcohol in the blood is an insufficient reason to violate a citizen's rights.

While the court did not spell out whether there were any circumstances in which a warrantless blood draw would be legal, Justice Kennedy indicated in a separate opinion that the court was interested in the question.

Again, all eyes may turn toward Utah for guidance. According to a spokesperson for the Utah Highway Patrol, which makes the most DUI arrests of any law enforcement agency in the state, troopers are trained that warrantless blood draws may be acceptable in limited circumstances. For example, it might be legal to perform the test if the suspect were unconscious or about to be taken to surgery.

Whether those circumstances in fact justify what would otherwise be a constitutional violation is now open to question. Since the U.S. Supreme Court has said it is a violation of the federal constitution, any state supreme court rulings could be overruled by federal ones in future cases.

Source: The Salt Lake Tribune, "Utah mentioned as Supreme Court rejects routine no-warrant DUI blood tests," Nate Carlisle and the Associated Press, April 17, 2013

No Comments

Leave a comment
Comment Information

Testimonials

  • I can’t speak highly enough of Kris and his team. I was always kept informed and educated on my options and potential outcomes. Kris was so professional and helped me feel at ease through a very difficult and emotional process. His expertise is second to none and you truly feel as though you’re in the best hands. Thanks for everything Kris, I consider you a great friend!Read more...

    — Tyler H.
  • Rand Lunceford was my attorney and he did a great job for me. Was always very quick to return phone calls and texts. Gave me court reminders the day before. And did a great job. when it was all said and done I was extremely impressed with Mr. Lunceford and their firm. Read more...

    — Brittany U.
  • I appreciate Michael's professionalism and willingness to listen to his clients. He truly cares for them and tries to see things from their perspective. That approach is refreshing and really helps in drawn-out cases. Michael is easy to get a hold of and quick to work on cases. Read more...

  • Brian attended mediation with us today and he was a rockstar. He was very knowledgeable and thorough. I don't know what we would have done without his well-informed counsel and the way he stood up for us. He maintained a calm and authoritative demeanor, even in the presence of the 4 other attorneys on the other "sides". We will be recommending him to anyone who needs a family law attorney, and we'll be choosing him if we ever need one again! Read more...

    — Tawny A.
  • Not to sound cliché... Justice was served!! I have never been in a situation to need a Lawyer. Lauren really stood up for me when forces were making a situation much larger than it should have been. Our situation was extremely difficult but choosing this law firm was the best chose i could have made for my family and I. I am so grateful that Lauren was in my corner fighting while I took care of my family. Words cant Express my gratitude. It is unfortunate that accusations can place people in situations that you cant handle or control...fortunately there are great people like Lauren Forsyth. Wonderful person, Great Lawyer! Read more...

Speak with an experienced lawyer.

If you need help with a divorce, family law issue, DUI or criminal defense, complex civil litigation, or real estate matter, we are here for you. To schedule an appointment with one of our dedicated attorneys call us at (801) 475-8800.

Email Us For A Response

Bold labels are required.

Contact Information
disclaimer.

The use of the Internet or this form for communication with the firm or any individual member of the firm does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through this form.

close

Privacy Policy

Office Locations

Ogden Office
195 25th Street
Suite 304
Ogden, UT 84401

Phone: 801-475-8800
Fax: 801-475-9800
Map to Ogden Office

Park City Office
136 Heber Avenue
Suite 305
Park City, UT 84060

Phone: 435-655-3680
Map to Park City Office

Lehi Office
3450 N. Triumph Blvd.
Suite 102-161
Lehi, UT 84043

Phone: 801-753-5650
Map to Lehi Office

Salt Lake City Office
299 South Main
Suite 1300
Salt Lake City, UT 84111

Phone: 801-317-8968
Phone: 801-534-4410
Map to Salt Lake City Office